Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers
Pages 1-6
. Izet Masic
Abstract The nature of performing a scientific research is a process that has several different
components which consist of identifying the key research question(s), choices of scientific
approach for the study and data collection, data analysis, and finally reporting on results.
Generally, peer review is a series of procedures in the evaluation of a creative work or
performance by other people, who work in the same or related field, with the aim of
maintaining and improving the quality of work or performance in that field. The assessment
of the achievement of every scientist, and thus indirectly determining his reputation in the
scientific community of these publications, especially journals, is done through the so‑called
impact factor index. The impact factor predicts or estimates that how many annual citations
article may receive after its publication. Evaluation of scientific productivity and assessment
of the published articles of researchers and scientists can be made through the so‑called
H‑index. The quality of published results of scientific work largely depends on knowledge
sources that are used in the preparation, which means that it should be considered to serve
the purpose and the very relevance of the information used. Scientometrics as a field of
science covers all aforementioned issues, and scientometric analysis is obligatory for quality
assessment of the scientific validity of published articles and other type of publications.
