Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Objective: Oxytocin routinely used as an uterotonic drug in cesarean delivery. Clothing 
problems, adverse effects on fibrinogen and bleeding were presented as side effects of 
oxytocin. In in vivo investigation, modest hypercoagulable state was suggested as a side effect 
for infusion of oxytocin in parturients. In this study, effects of two different infusion rates of 
oxytocin on coagulation of parturient were evaluated during cesarean delivery.
Methods: In a randomized double‑blinded clinical trial, 84 healthy parturient in two equal 
groups took oxytocin infusion with the rate of 15 IU/h (Group A) or 30 IU/h (Group B), 
after the umbilical cord clamping. Coagulation status measured 30 min after beginning of 
infusion by thromboelastography. Data were analyzed by χ2
, paired sample test and ANOVA 
considering as significant at P < 0.05.
Findings: The mean (standard deviation) of variables in GroupsA and B were 2.4024 (0.86) 
and 2.0429 (0.68) for K (kinetics of clot development), 55.4429 (11.30) and 60.7595 (10.41) 
for α (speed of clot strengthening) and 59.779 (19.15) and 70.61 (11.30) for maximum 
amplitude (maximum clot strength), respectively. The P values for these variables were 0.036, 
0.028 and <0.001, respectively; these changes are consistent with increasing coagulability. 
Other measures did not have significant differences.
Conclusion: This in vivo investigation clarified that increasing infusion rate of oxytocin to 
30 IU/h can augment coagulability in term parturients.

Keywords

1. Tollånes MC. Increased rate of Caesarean sections-Causes and 
consequences. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2009;129:1329‑31.
2. Fairley L, Dundas R, Leyland AH. The influence of both 
individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal 
trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980‑2000. BMC 
Public Health 2011;11:330.
3. Alves B, Sheikh A. Investigating the relationship 
between affluence and elective caesarean sections. BJOG 
2005;112:994‑6.
4. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and 
Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National 
sentinel caesarean section audit report. Royal College of 
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. BMJ 2004;328:665.
5. Cai WW, Marks JS, Chen CH, Zhuang YX, Morris L, Harris JR. 
Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of 
health insurance in Shanghai, China. Am J Public Health 
1998;88:777‑80.
6. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, 
Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: Final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat 
Rep 2010;58:1‑85.
7. Ibrahim M, Ziegler C, Klam SL, Wieczorek P, Abenhaim HA. 
Incidence, indications, and predictors of adverse outcomes of 
postpartum hysterectomies: 20‑year experience in a tertiary 
care centre. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014;36:14‑20.
8. MehrabadiA, Liu S, Bartholomew S, Hutcheon JA, KramerMS, 
Liston RM, et al. Temporal trends in postpartum hemorrhage 
and severe postpartum hemorrhage in Canada from 2003 to 
2010. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014;36:21‑33.
9. Mousa HA, Alfirevic Z. Treatment for primary postpartum 
haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Jan 24;(1) 
:CD003249.
10. Montufar‑Rueda C, Rodriguez L, Jarquin JD, Barboza A, 
Bustillo MC, Marin F, et al. Severe postpartum hemorrhage 
from uterine atony: A multicentric study. J Pregnancy 2013; 
Article ID: 525914.
11. Dildy GA 3rd. Postpartum hemorrhage: New management 
options. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002;45:330‑44.
12. Combs CA, Murphy EL, Laros RK Jr. Factors associated with 
postpartum hemorrhage with vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 
1991;77:69‑76.
13. Bohlmann MK, Rath W. Medical prevention and treatment 
of postpartum hemorrhage: A comparison of different 
guidelines. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014 Mar; 289:555‑67.
14. Prata N, Bell S, Weidert K. Prevention of postpartum 
hemorrhage in low‑resource settings: Current perspectives. 
Int J Womens Health 2013;5:737‑52.
15. Belfort MA. Overview of postpartum hemorrhage. Up‑to‑date 
Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/
overview‑of‑postpartum‑hemorrhage. [Last updated on 2014 
Feb 10].
16. Westhoff G, Cotter AM, Tolosa JE. Prophylactic oxytocin for 
the third stage of labour to prevent postpartum haemorrhage. 
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;10:CD001808.
17. Elbourne DR, Prendiville WJ, Carroli G, Wood J, McDonald S. 
Prophylactic use of oxytocin in the third stage of labour. 
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD001808.
18. CunninghamFG, LevenoKJ, BloomSL, HauthJC, Gilstrap II LC, 
Wenstrom KD. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York, (NY): 
McGraw Hill Medical; 2010. p. 399.
19. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s 
Health. Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. London 
NW1 4RGRCOG Press; 2004.
20. Sheehan SR, Montgomery AA, Carey M, McAuliffe FM, 
Eogan M, Gleeson R, et al. Oxytocin bolus versus oxytocin 
bolus and infusion for control of blood loss at elective 
caesarean section: Double blind, placebo controlled, 
randomised trial. BMJ 2011;343:d4661.
21. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 
ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical Management Guidelines 
for Obstetrician‑Gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: 
Postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1039‑47.
22. Available from: http://www.drugs.com/sfx/
oxytocin‑side‑effects.html. [Last Accessed on 2014 Feb 13].
23. Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/
oxytocin‑drug‑information?source=see_link and utdPopup=true. [Last Accessed on 2014 Feb 13].
24. Available from: http://www.medicinenet.com/
oxytocin‑injectable/article.htm. [Last Accessed on 2014 Feb 13].
25. Available from: http://www.services.medicines.org.
uk/assethosting/assets/printable/o/x/oxytocin/printable. 
1946_529_2198.pdf. [Last Accessed on 2014 Feb 13].
26. ButwickA, Harter S. An in vitro investigation of the coagulation 
effects of exogenous oxytocin using thromboelastography in 
healthy parturients. Anesth Analg 2011;113:323‑6.
27. Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group 
randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004;4:26.
28. Staikou C, Paraskeva A, Fassoulaki A. The impact of 30 ml/kg 
hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs. hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 
on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. 
Indian J Med Res 2012;136:445‑50.