Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharm D, St. Peter's Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh, India
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness and perception of general
educated Indian individuals about Doctor of Pharmacy course.
Methods: A cross‑sectional structured Pharm.D questionnaire survey was conducted at
educational institutions of India mainly through e‑mails. Pharm.D questionnaire survey was
conducted over a period of six months. The questionnaire was classified into four major
categories, including course‑related questions, roles‑related questions, critical comparative
questions, and opinion‑based questions. The responses were collected and analyzed to assess
the opinions and attitudes of the study population regarding the course Pharm.D.
Findings: Out of 2819 responses, 66.01% agreed that Indian syllabus, teaching procedure,
and hospital training in institutions are enough to prepare an ideally graduated Pharm.D.
Respondents of about 70.59% agreed that Pharm.Ds should take care of complete
responsibility of drug therapy rather than physicians prescribing the medications and Pharm.
Ds fixing the dose. The statement “Pharm.Ds play a vital role in improving medication
adherence through patient counseling” was accepted by 47.80%, whereas 41.40% did not
accept it as they felt that the Pharm.D’s role in this regard is not more than the physician’s
role, and 10.80% suggested that other healthcare professionals would play a better role.
Among all the respondents, 73.64% of the study population was found to be ready for giving
equal credit and respect to Pharm.Ds as physicians.
Conclusion: Our survey emphasizes on the opinion of educated people of having Pharm.Ds
in both government and private hospitals to take care of complete therapy and for improving
medication adherence.
Keywords
and professional challenges. J Pharm Res 2011;10:97‑101.
2. Deshpande PR, Farooq KK, John DM, Rao EJ. Pharm D: Anew
concept in India. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012;4:84‑6.
3. Frequently asked questions about PharmD. Available from:
http://www.pci.nic.in/PDF‑Files/question.PDF. [Last cited on
2011 Mar 13].
4. Pharm.D Course‑Clarification regarding nomenclature of
Pharm.D/Pharm.D (Post Baccalaureate) on pass certificates.
Available from: http://www.pci.nic.in/PolicyCirculars/
Circulars.aspx. [Last cited on 2012 Feb 18].
5. Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity.
Nurs Res 1986;35:382‑5.
6. Bock LM, Duong MT, Williams JS. Enhancing clinical services
by using pharmacy students during advanced experiential
rotations. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:566‑9.
7. Pham DQ. Evaluating the impact of clinical interventions by
PharmD students on internal medicine clerkships: The results
of a 3 year study. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:1541‑5.
8. Mateti UV, Rajesh, V, Laddha A, Sharma S, Anantha NN.
Activities of Pharm D students in Indian Hospital. Pharma
Rev 2011;7:133‑4.
9. Chisholm MA, Hawkins DW, Taylor AT. Providing
pharmaceutical care: Are pharmacy students beneficial to
patients? Hosp Pharm 1997;32:371‑3.
10. Clinical pharmacists improve patient care and help hospitals
to treat more patients. The society of hospital pharmacists of
Australia, 2011. Available from: http://www.shpa.rentsoft.biz/
lib/pdf/whatsnew/cpis‑final.pdf. [Last cited on 2012 Jan 10].
11. Micheal D, Antun D, Margaret C, Sylvia C, Galbraith K,
Matthews H. SHPA Standards of Practice for Clinical
Pharmacy. J Pharm Pract Res 2005;35:122‑46.
12. Pharm. D. Regulations 2008. The Gazette of India, No.19, PartIII,
Section 4. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Pharmacy
Council of India) New Delhi, 10th May, 2008. p. 1‑97. Available
from: http://www.pci.nic.in/PDF‑Files/PharmD‑Revised‑A.
pdf. [Last cited on 2012 Mar 27].
)