Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Objective: Synergistic effect between commonly used antibiotics against nosocomial 
multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, if present, could provide a viable 
option as an alternative therapy for infections due to this pathogen. The aim of this study 
was searching for any synergistic effect between several antibiotics against drug-resistant 
strains of S. aureus with nosocomial origin using double-disk synergy test and to determine 
the applicability of this test for such a purpose.
Methods: Over a 6-month period, strains of S. aureus isolated from clinical specimens 
of hospitalized patients with documented nosocomial infection underwent disk diffusion 
test using antibiotic disks of oxacillin, cephalothin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, 
cotrimoxazole, rifampin, erythromycin, gentamicin and meropenem. Double-disk synergy test 
was performed for all isolates resistant to at least two of applied antibiotics. Combinations 
of all possible pairs of antibiotics (to which the microorganism was resistant) were tested 
by placing antibiotic disks at distance of 20 mm from each other (center to center). After 
16-20 hours of incubation, if synergistic effect was present among two antibiotics, an inhibition 
zone was formed between their disks.
Findings: Among all of possible two-antibiotic combinations tested for 41 resistant isolates, 
only two cases of synergistic effect were detected; both effects were among rifampin and 
cotrimoxazole.
Conclusion: The combination of rifampin and cotrimoxazole could provide a viable option 
for treatment of infections due to resistant strains of S. aureus; however, clinical trials are 
needed before any new recommendation. Also, double-disk synergy test seems to be capable 
of detecting the synergistic effect between antibiotics at in vitro level.

Keywords

  1. Daum RS, Seal JB. Evolving antimicrobial chemotherapy for 
    Staphylococcus aureus infections: Our backs to the wall. Crit 
    Care Med 2000;29:92-6.
    2. Sader HS, Biedenbach DJ, Fedler KA, Fritsche TR, Jones RN. 
    Frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of 
    bacterial isolates causing bloodstream infections worldwide: 
    Report from 8 years of the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance 
    program (1997-2004) [abstr]. In: Program and abstracts of 
    the 45th interscience conference on antimicrobial agents 
    and chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for 
    Microbiology; 2005.
    3. Salgado CD, Farr BM, Calfee DP. Community-acquired 
    methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A meta-analysis 
    of prevalence and risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:131-9.
    4. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel 
    RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in 
    US hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective 
    nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:309-17.
    5. Drew RH. Emerging options for treatment of invasive, 
    multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. 
    Pharmacotherapy 2007;27:227-9.
    6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reduced 
    susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin—
    Japan, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997;46:624-6.
    7. Hiramatsu K, Hanaki H, Ino T, Yabuta K, Oguri T, Tenover FC. 
    Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with 
    reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother 
    1997;40:135-6.
    8. Turco TF, Melko GP, Williams JR. Vancomycin intermediateresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Pharmacother 
    1998;32:758-60.
    9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Staphylococcus 
    aureus resistant to vancomycin—United States, 2002. MMWR 
    Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51:565-7.
    10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health 
    dispatch: Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureusPennsylvania, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 
    2002;51:902.
    11. Quirk M. First VRSA isolate identified in USA. Lancet Infect 
    Dis 2002;2:510.
    12. Tenover FC, Weigel LM, Appelbaum PC, McDougal LK, 
    Chaitram J, McAllister S, et al. Vancomycin-resistant 
    Staphylococcus aureus isolate from a patient in Pennsylvania. 
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:275-80.
    13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vancomycinresistant Staphylococcus aureus—New York, 2004. MMWR 
    Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:322-3
  2. 14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance 
    standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing 2009. CLSI 
    document M100–S19. 29 (3). CLSI, Wayne, PA.
    15. Gosbell IB. Time-kill and disk synergy studies with nonbeta-lactams against non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant 
    Staphylococcus aureus. Pathology 2006;38:259-61.
    16. Kaka AS, Rueda AM, Shelburne SA III, Hulten K, Hamill RJ, 
    Musher DM. Bactericidal activity of orally available agents 
    against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J 
    Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:680-3.
    17. Harvey RJ. Antagonistic interaction of rifampicin and 
    trimethoprim. J Antimicrob Chemother 1978;4:315-27.
  3. 18. Jemni L, Hmouda H, Letaief A. Efficacy of trimethoprim/
    sulfamethoxazole against clinical isolates of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus: A report from Tunisia. Clin 
    Infect Dis 1994;19:202-3.